

Standardization of digital technologies of simulator systems as a method of ensuring reliability of conditions of service of power engineering facilities (part 3)
https://doi.org/10.24223/1999-5555-2020-13-3-164-187
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of creating standardized digital simulator systems, in order to ensure reliable service conditions of electric power facilities. The article presents the reasons which prevented all simulator designers in power engineering from ensuring efficient functional properties of simulation systems for operator training. The primary problem was the lack of methods and procedures for developing the simulator’s core subsystem – a mathematical model of a power facility, because the existing standards, norms and technical requirements were only concerned with the structure and functional properties of simulator subsystems. These reasons and circumstances determine the current state of the Russian simulator production; its negative trends are covered in depth in this article. There is also a critical assessment of simulators designed by some of the Russian engineers: these machines are not conducive to improving the quality of training and retraining of operating personnel of power companies. The article identifies the concept of a physical-statistical approach to developing a power facility simulation model: it includes preparing an analytical description of the physical processes at the simulation object, adapted to real processes, taking into account real-time sample observation, collecting and analyzing statistical procedure data, adjusting the model structure and assessing the parameters and states of the facility model. This approach concept defines the main aspect of modern methodology for setting and achieving all goals related to the energy facility modeling for simulator construction. Western sanctions and import substitution requirements dictate the necessity of developing home-grown technology, manufacturing and introducing new equipment in power engineering, including the sphere of simulator production. The designers of Russian simulators should understand that the principles and technical rules of power equipment imported from Western countries, including automatic control systems for such equipment, are different from the ones which the Unified Power System of Russia is based on. It is emphasized that, in real operating conditions of Russian power facilities, reliability of operation, maintenance and repair personnel is essential. It is noted that, in order to improve this reliability, it is necessary to develop a new regulatory document which would fully explore its topic: ensuring consistent and efficient methods for developing the structure and functions of digital technological systems for training power facility personnel.
About the Authors
S. I. MagidRussian Federation
bldg. 6, 125Zh, Varshavskoe shosse, 117587, Moscow, Russia
I. Sh. Zagredtinov
Russian Federation
Spartakovskaya St, 2a, bldg 1, 105066, Moscow, Russia
S. V. Mishcheryakov
Russian Federation
Krasnokazarmennaya street, 13P, 111250, Moscow, Russia
Ye. N. Arkhipova
Russian Federation
bldg. 6, 125Zh, Varshavskoe shosse, 117587, Moscow, Russia
V. L. Samoylov
Russian Federation
14 Avtozavodskaya St, 115280, Moscow, Russia
References
1. RD 34.12.302 (SO 153-34.12.302). Instructions for Building a Complex of Teaching and Simulation Systems for the Training of Power Generating Units Operating Personnel of Thermal Power Plants, Nuclear Power Plants, Power Grid Enterprises, Power Systems and Unions, 1986.
2. RD 34.12.303. Primary Technical Requirements to Complex Simulators for Training of the Operational Personnel of Power Generating Units of Thermal Power Plants, 1988.
3. Theory and Technology of Control Systems. Multifunctional PCSs of Thermal Power Plants. In 3 volumes. / Under the general editorship of Dr. Tverskiy, Prof. Dr.-Eng. Yu. S. Tverskiy; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ivanovo State Power Engineering University named after V.I. Lenin” – Ivanovo, 2013.
4. Grabchak Ye. P. The Issues of Technical Regulation in Power Engineering // Nadezhnost Bezop. Energ., No. 4 (31), pp. 7 – 13, 2015.
5. Magid S. I., Arkhipova E. N., Kulichikhin V. V. Topical Issues of Simulator Development in Modern Power Engineering // Nadezhnost Bezop. Energ., No. 4 (31), pp. 20 – 34 (2015).
6. Rotach, V. Ya. Elaborating main provisions of the theory of automated control with nondeterministic objects. // Theory and Practice of Building and Operation of Automated Control Systems. // Collection of Scientific Papers, Moscow: MPEI, 1998.
7. Popyrin L. S. Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Thermal Power Units. Moscow: Energiya, 1978; 416 pp.
8. Magid S. I., Arkhipova E. N., Muzyka L. P. Reliability of personnel is one of the major safeguards (in Russian) // Nadezhnost Bezop. Energ., No. 1, pp. 22 – 33 (2008).
9. Magid S. I.; Arkhipova E. N. Anthropogenic and technogenic factors of operational risk at hazardous industrial objects of fuel-power complex. // International Conference “The 9th University Seminar on Thermophysics and Power Engineering”: a collection of reports / In 4 volumes. Volume 1. – Kazan: Kazan State Power Engineering University. 2015.
10. Hall W. Environmental Impact of Control, International Federation of Automatic Control, 6th Triennial World Congress, Boston, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, Plenary papers IFAC, USA 2005.
11. Dozortsev V. M., Agafonov D. V. New approach to attainment of model’s adequacy in industrial process simulators. // Proc. 4th All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Simulation Modeling: Theory and Practice” (IMMOD-2009). Saint-Petersburg.
12. STU. 115.015-2003. Applied Software for Simulators of Thermal Power Plants and Networks. – Moscow: Russian Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. 2003.
13. Suitability Standards for Software Tools for Training Power Engineering Personnel RD 153-34.0-12.305-99 – Moscow, RAO “Unified Power System of Russia”. 1999.
14. STO 1.1.1.01.004.0680-2006 “Technical Training Aids”. Rosenergoatom.
15. American National Standard Nuclear Power Plant Simulators for Use in Operator Training, ANSI/ANS-3.5-1985.
16. American National Standard Fossil Power Plant Simulators. Functional Requirements (Draft). ISA SP77/20, 1993.
17. Ochkov V. F. et al. Simulator for Training Heat Network Personnel. / Moscow: Energy Saving and Water Treatment, No. 1, 2007.
18. Magid S. I., Zagretdinov, I. Sh.; Muzyka L. P., Arkhipova E. N. Human Potential and the Concept of Reliability in Power Engineering. / Moscow: Energy Saving and Water Treatment, No. 3, 2005.
19. https://www.testenergo.ru/files/mpei2nvgres.pdf
20. Friedman A .A. The world as space and time. Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
21. Frog B. N., Pervov A. G. Water Treatment. Textbook for Higher Education Institutions: – Moscow: Publishing House ASV, 2015.
22. The Human Factor. Edited by G. Salvendi. In 6 volumes. Volume 3. Modeling of Activity, Professional Training and Selection of Operators: Translation from English / Holding D., Goldstein I., Eberts R., et al. – (Part II. Professional Training and Selection of Operators). – Moscow: Mir, 1991. – 302 pp., illustrated.
23. Magid S. I., Zagretdinov I. S., Lvov M. Y., Mishcheriakov S. V., Sysoeva L. V., Muzyka L. P., Kropachev S. А., Arkhipova E. N. Human Potential and Reliability in Power Engineering. Omsk-Moscow. TEST Publishing House, 2005.
24. Wiener N. Cybernetics. Nauka, 1983.
25. Bagrova N. D. Time Factor in the Human Perception. Leningrad: Nauka, 1980.
26. Bichaev B. P. Method for the allowable error determination in the modeling of parameters used for simulator trainees’ evaluation // Upr. Sist. Mash., No. 3, 1980.
27. Plyutinskii V. I., Okhotin V. V. Method for accuracy assessment for dynamic models of power generating units simulators // Teploenergetika, No. 10, 1985.
28. Magid S. I.; Ibragimov I. M. Power System Modeling. Moscow: “Apart”, 2002.
29. Arthorn C. H. Nuclear power plant training simulator // "ASEAJournal". 1973 Vol. 46; 3: 73.
30. Schwarz O., Schlegel G. Ausbildung von Kraftwerks personal fur fossilbefeuerte Kraftwerke an Simulatoren, Konzepton, Qwalification und Nutzen des KWS-Simulators. VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 65, Heft 2, Februar 1985; 104 – 109.
31. Arakelyan E. K.; Andryushin A. V., Burtsev S. Yu. Use of Computer Simulators for Model Research in Power Engineering // MPEI Journal, No. 2, 2015; pp. 50 – 55.
32. Rules for Technical Operation of Power Stations and Networks in the Russian Federation // Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. – Moscow: SPO ORGRES, 2003. – 320 pp.
33. Isomorphism. Philosophical Encyclopedia. Volume 2. Мoscow, 1962.
34. Patent No. 2684886 of April 15, 2019. Complex Recursive Identification Simulator (CRIT-1) for Training Power Facility Operators. Authors: Magid, S. I. Arkhipova E. N.
35. Patent No. 2692163 of June 21, 2019. Complex Recursive Identification Simulator (CRIT-2) with Automated Control System Setup for Training Power Facility Operators. Authors: Magid S. I.; Arkhipova E. N.
Review
For citations:
Magid S.I., Zagredtinov I.Sh., Mishcheryakov S.V., Arkhipova Ye.N., Samoylov V.L. Standardization of digital technologies of simulator systems as a method of ensuring reliability of conditions of service of power engineering facilities (part 3). Safety and Reliability of Power Industry. 2020;13(3):164-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24223/1999-5555-2020-13-3-164-187