Preview

Safety and Reliability of Power Industry

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Methodological aspects of assessment and forecast of technical condion of the main installed equipment of power plants

https://doi.org/10.24223/1999-5555-2018-11-2-134-142

Abstract

The methodology is presented for assessment of the technical condition of an object, which is a separate unit of power equipment from a group of the same type of equipment of power plants. It is demonstrated that technical condition is a characteristic of quality of an object under investigation, which, for practical purposes, should be calculated as a deviation from an established value. The assessment of technical condition is fulfilled with uniform criteria based on a limited amount of initial data on each of the basic properties of the object. The assessment can be fulfilled at the level of the object performance indicator, at the level of the object individual property and at the level of a set of the object properties. The top level assessment is a function of the loss of quality by the object, which is calculated through convolution of low level values. The assessment of technical condition of an object is accompanied by calculation of uncertainty of quality loss functions by means of transformation of uncertainties of initial data into uncertainties of output values. The evaluation of the technical condition can be expressed either in relative units - the percentage of quality loss relative to the maximum possible quality of the object, or in absolute units - the monetary equivalent of a loss of quality by the object. Evaluation in relative units enables to determine the residual gamma resource of the object, but this requires the participation of an expert to assign the weight of performance indicators. Evaluation in absolute units makes it possible to identify objects whose improvement in technical condition is appropriate from the economic point of view. To track the reasons for deviations in the technical condition from the set values, a structured list of performance indicators and factors affecting them is used. It is shown that the possibilities of evaluating the technical condition in relative units are limited: an attempt to perform assessment and analysis of the technical condition by convolving values of indicators and characteristics of properties into a single numerical index gives incorrect results. Neglect of these restrictions leads to emergence of inadequate, unsubstantiated scientifically methodological requirements for assessment of the technical condition of power equipment.

About the Author

A. A. Rimov

Russian Federation
Alexey Rimov


References

1. GOST ISO 9000-2011 Interstate Standard. Quality management systems. Basic provisions and vocabulary.

2. Azgaldov G. G. Theory and practice of assessing the quality of goods (the basis of qualimetry). Moscow: Economics; 1982. (In Russ.)

3. GOST 2.601-2006 Unifi ed system of design documentation. Operational documents. (In Russ.)

4. Order of Rostekhnadzor of 25.03.2014. №116 On the approval of federal norms and regulations in the field of industrial safety "Industrial safety rules for hazardous industrial facilities, which use equipment operating under excessive pressure." (In Russ.)

5. Belyaev Yu. K., Bogatyrev V. A, Bolotin V. V., Gadasin V. A., Gaziev E. G., Davtyan M. D. et al. Reliability of technical systems: A Handbook edited by Ushakov I. A. Moscow: Radio and Communication; 1985. (In Russ.)

6. Technical inspection of the EES. Draft Rules for the Organization of Maintenance and Repair of Equipment, Buildings and Structures of Power Stations and Networks. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)

7. СО 34.20.609-2003 Methodical recommendations for determining the normative value of costs for maintenance and repair of power equipment, buildings and structures of power plants. (In Russ.)

8. РД 34.08.552-95 Methodical instructions for drawing up a report of the power plant and the joint stock company of energy and electrifi cation on the thermal economy of equipment. (In Russ.)

9. T. Saati. Making decisions. The method of analyzing hierarchies. Translation from English by R. G. Vachnadze. Moscow: Radio and Communication;1993. (In Russ.)

10. Order of the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation of 23.07.2012 №340 "On approval of the list of information provided by electricity entities, the forms and order of its presentation." (In Russ.)

11. http://www.nts-ees.ru/sites/default/files/protokol_gis_tek.pdf.

12. https://www.gis-tek.ru/

13. IEEE Standard Defi nitions for Use in Reporting Electric Generating Unit Reliability, Availability, and Productivity. IEEEStd 762™;2006.

14. The Government of the Russian Federation. Decree of December 19, 2016 No. 1401 On the comprehensive determination of indicators of the technical and economic status of power facilities, including indicators of physical wear and energy efficiency of electric grid facilities, and on the monitoring of such indicators. (In Russ.)

15. Grabchak E. P. Assessment of technical condition of power equipment in conditions of digital economy. Safety and Reliability of Power Industry. 2017; 10(4): 268–274. (In Russ.)

16. ISO / IEC GUIDE 98-3: 2008 Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM: 1995).

17. Rimov A. A., Chukanova T. I., Trofi movYu. V. Practical application of the benchmarking methodology to increase the reliability and economy of power plants and the main thermal mechanical equipment of TPP.


Review

For citations:


Rimov A.A. Methodological aspects of assessment and forecast of technical condion of the main installed equipment of power plants. Safety and Reliability of Power Industry. 2018;11(2):134-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24223/1999-5555-2018-11-2-134-142

Views: 752


ISSN 1999-5555 (Print)
ISSN 2542-2057 (Online)